Skip to main content

This 2026 Blues draft pick carries the most risk

If he can stick down the middle, it's a win, otherwise it could be a whiff.
Jun 26, 2026; Buffalo, New York, USA; Maddox Dagenais reacts beside NHL commissioner Gary Bettman after being selected with the sixteenth pick in the first round of the 2026 NHL Draft by the St. Louis Blues at KeyBank Center. Mandatory Credit: Timothy T. Ludwig-Imagn Images
Jun 26, 2026; Buffalo, New York, USA; Maddox Dagenais reacts beside NHL commissioner Gary Bettman after being selected with the sixteenth pick in the first round of the 2026 NHL Draft by the St. Louis Blues at KeyBank Center. Mandatory Credit: Timothy T. Ludwig-Imagn Images | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

With a week having passed since the NHL draft and the dust of the first day of free agency settling, we can now reflect a bit more on the St. Louis Blues' selections in Doug Armstrong's final draft as general manager. Adding a new goalie to the pipeline is never a bad idea, considering how up and down the position can be, and drafting Tynan Lawrence 11th overall was a sound bet on a player with an easy-to-envision path to becoming a second-line center.

However, after the Blues traded away the 15th-overall pick to the Anaheim Ducks in exchange for Mason McTavish, they may've made a slight misstep with pick 16. Maddox Dagenais is an intriguing prospect who's got a lot of enticing tools and has a chance to stick down the middle, but may ultimately be a winger once he reaches the pros.

Getting a middle-six winger 16th overall in a lackluster draft isn't the end of the world, but it's a risky pick for the Blues because it meant passing on Ethan Belchetz--a far more promising and exciting prospect than Dagenais.

Belchetz has all the tools of a top-six power winger, hampered only really by his skating. Dagenais, too, has skating troubles, but his game is far less projectable due to his hockey sense--it's the main reason he's iffy to stick at center in the NHL.

So, if you know you're getting a winger with the 16th-overall pick, why make the riskier selection (Dagenais) over the high-end projection (Belchetz)? The Blues lack true top-of-the-lineup prospects, and Belchetz is a player who has the makeup to get there; Dagenais does not, barring a massive leap in the next few years.

For better or worse, Blues fans will compare the career trajectories of Dagenais and Belchetz. If Belchetz turns into the top-six, playoff-ready winger he could be, and Dagenais tops out as a third-line winger, we'll be left wondering what could've been.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations